Controversial Issues in the Classroom

Discussions of politics, religion, social issues, sexuality, race, or gender have often been seen as loaded. This is particularly true in a classroom where students come from different backgrounds and there could be a mix of privileged and underprivileged individuals. The debate on whether to incorporate controversial-issue discussions in the classroom has raged since the early nineties, and is still ongoing today (Long & Long, 1975). But what defines a controversial-issue discussion, exactly? It is a dialogue among people on a topic that could potentially be of emotional content or disagreement. Often they are issues that divide societies and can lead to conflict. A particular topic of controversy can vary from a local matter to a global one (Harwood & Hahn, 1990). A discussion of the hallmarks of a ‘strong’ student versus a ‘weak’ student would be specific to a particular classroom, while the topic of religious wars can be seen as a global issue. Both these topics could be uncomfortable to discuss and yet many educators promote the need to engage students in topics that have the potential for discord. Why?

Image by Gerd Altmann on Pixabay

            Involving students in controversial-issues discussions has benefits for building future citizens. Indeed, students will be confronted, as adults, with divisive issues and if they do not learn to address them at school, then they will struggle later on. Harwood & Hahn (1990) give three reasons of why discussing controversial issues in the classroom is important. For one, it allows students to develop critical thinking. When engaged in discussions, students develop skills such as generating ideas and hypotheses, debating their points and evaluating solutions. The National Council of Social Studies (NCSS) also supports this claim. It promotes the idea that teaching students to be critical thinkers needs to be done through controversial-issues discussions in the classroom (Byford, Lennon & Russell, 2009). Second, students are able to develop interpersonal skills when engaged in controversial-issues discussions (Harwood & Hahn, 1990). They learn to understand the format of proper communication by developing listening skills, responding respectfully and delivering convincing points. Last, students get the opportunity to prepare for citizenship. Newmann (1989) explains how for there to be citizenship—particularly in a democratic setting—individuals need to debate on the issues of the community. As such, the classroom needs to be a laboratory in which students practice their future roles as citizens (as cited Harwood & Hahn, 1990, p. 3). Another benefit to discussing controversial issues in the classroom is argued by Long and Long (1975) who found that students who engaged in these debates tend to follow news and current events more, and speak with their friends and families about varied social or political issues. In addition, they tend to develop civic tolerance and increased interest in social issues and politics (Harwood & Hahn, 1990).

Incorporating controversial-issues discussion in the classroom definitely promotes a sense of citizenship in students. It allows them to learn about freedom of speech (and the tolerance that it entails), develop critical thinking skills and improve communication abilities. Yet, many teachers and students remain reluctant to talk about topics that are controversial in the classroom (Long & Long, 1975; Misco, 2013). 

References:

Byford, J., Lennon, S., & Russell, W. B. (2009). Teaching Controversial Issues in the Social Studies: A Research Study of High School Teachers. Clearing House, 82(4), 165-170.

Harwood, A., M. & Hahn, C., L. (1990). Controversial Issues in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education Bloomington IN. ERIC Identifier: ED327453

Long, S. & Long, R (1975). Controversy in the Classroom: Student Viewpoint and Educational Outcome. Teaching Political Science 2, 275-299.

Misco, T. (2013). ‘We do not talk about these things’: the promises and challenges of reflective thinking and controversial issue discussions in a Chinese high school. Intercultural Education, 24(5), 401-416. doi:10.1080/14675986.2013.842663

Body or Mind?

Once in a while I sit on my couch and ponder about what I have learned this past year… Have I become a better person? Have I reached my potential as an educator? Have I made someone's life better than what it was? Or, really, have I just spent most of my days in bed, watching TV? Of course, answering these questions would take much more time than a few minutes of thoughts… Which is why I'm writing this. As I am typing this, I'm hoping that it will allow me to brainstorm and come up with a list of things that I am doing right, and things that I should work on.

I'm reaching the end of my 2nd year of my PhD program, so this is a great time to think about this. I have to admit, it was tough… Not so much the courses themselves, but balancing my studies with work, assignments, social life, other important goals, family matters… Phheeewwwww… It takes a toll on you. Yet, when you reach the end and realize that you did it, it almost makes you forget all the hardship that it took… So of course I'll do it again next year! Complain about it while it happen, and feel satisfied when it's over.

But really if I take a step back and look at things that happened, I have reached a few milestones that I am proud of. I am close to reaching the honour of 'Distinguished Toastmaster', I presented my academic research at a few renowned conferences, I launched an organization called ABA, I made enough money to pay rent, food, and even a few trips here and there (all this while studying full-time), I kept a high GPA at school, and I managed to support my friends when they needed me. BUT BUT BUT… I also lacked sleep, spent a considerable amount of time in front of my computer, ate unhealthy meals, and exercised very little. In other words, my mind has done lots of gymnastics (which is great), but my body none (which is terrible).

Here comes my dilemma: body or mind? If I start spending more time sleeping, eating healthier and moving around, that would considerably reduce the time I will use to work. Let's say I decide to walk to my university: that's 45 minutes time that I could have used reading an article. Let's say I decide to go to the gym 3 times a week, that's about 5 hours a week that I could have used to write an article. And when it comes to eating healthy, it's not so much that it takes time, but rather than it costs money… And when you are a full-time student, your source of income is limited…

Having said this, I of course understand that having a healthy mind with an unheatlhty body has limitations… Before you know it, your body will take over your mind; and then you will have nothing left. So, instead of sitting on this couch and writing this, perhaps it would be smart for me to get up and go for a run… Despite the cold. 

Yep, my brainstorming is over. Thanks for reading. Off I go!